Skip to main content

STAR Readers - ST Week 3.2

I am a firm believer that learning never ends, and as a future educator, I aim to support the continuous growth and development of my students’ knowledge and skills by providing them with multiple opportunities for formative assessment and revision before any summative demonstrations of learning. Unfortunately, not all mandated assessments for students attending schools in the United States offer the same sort of “test, reflect, revise, and repeat” cycle that nurtures continuous learning in the same way that I strive to do in my unit planning. From my own experiences, Massachusetts’s MCAS testing was a high stakes exam for my teachers, but students also felt the pressure to meet statewide curriculum and performance goals. The value of standardized testing is a hot debate topic among educators, and while the progressivist teacher in me tends to stand against standardized testing (after all, standardized tests focus on state statistics and curriculum in a way that reduces the centrality of the student), I was highly impressed with how Mr. J employed Vermont’s STAR Reading exam in his classroom.




Last Thursday, Team Nova’s eighth graders completed the STAR Reading exam, an online reading test that gathers various literacy statistics for participating students (approximate Lexile levels, grade levels for reading, how students compare to their peers and school community, etc.). Students take the exam anywhere between 3 and 5 times a year as a means to measure their progress as independent readers. While a lot of our students scored in the eighth grade target areas for the STAR, some results were pleasantly surprising, and others came as a bit of a shock. Expecting the score to be a “one and done” deal like most standardized tests I have taken in the past, I was elated to learn that students who scored lower than Mr. J had predicted would be offered a second opportunity to take the STAR. Tuesday, students completed a second round of STAR testing if their scores were below what Mr. J truly believed their capabilities were. The results were far better than Thursday’s exam scores: most second round students scored at or above their target areas compared to their September scores.

There are about a million thoughts that come to mind when I ponder the STAR exam and standardized testing. For starters, and parallel to my last post about “the Fridays,” how much does the time of day/week impact student performance on standardized tests? I know I will have little control over when certain tests are given, but will I have opportunities to advocate for students who may benefit from testing on a certain day or at a certain time? Next, does repeating the STAR exam technically skew the literacy data for our classroom? Student data uses the best scores on the STAR exam(s) taken within a certain timeframe, so while each student is only accounted for once, taking one student’s better scores compared to another’s single score seems like equitable testing could get lost in translation. Where do you draw the line for who qualifies to retest? What about students whose scores are thought to reflect a “bad” day? Students will have days where some material is more difficult to digest than on others, no matter the subject area or task assigned in class. Should student data really be based on a “better” day set of test scores? What, then, defines true student capabilities?

While I walk the line between agreeing and disagreeing with my students retaking the STAR, I am positive that I support the idea of students being given the opportunity to learn from their past experiences in order to revise for the future. With new “What I Need”/ intervention groups forming based on our new STAR data this week, I look forward to seeing how well students grow in their humanities, science, or math skills over the course of their third term WIN placements.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

YA Lit.: Dumplin'

Nowadays, young adult literature covers a wide range of themes, offering commentary on everything from self-image and confidence to abuse and death. While the recent release of the Netflix series (based on the novel) 13 Reasons Why   has arguably created a negative association between young adults and literature, there are plenty of YA novels that deal with teenage realities beyond suicide. Julie Murphy's Dumplin' , a novel full of southern charm and the narrator Willowdean's no non-sense sarcasm, provides the reader with a classic battle between feeling good in your own skin and wanting to fit in with society's bodily expectations. Willowdean, an overweight 11th grader in a town obsessed with an annual beauty pageant, can't seem to get away from the local pressures to be a beauty queen. Usually comfortable in her skin, Willowdean starts to question her confidence when a co-worker shows romantic interest. Although dealing with a serious topic that could...

On Teaching and Reflection

Somewhere on my bookshelves, sandwiched between worn copies of literary classics and young adult novels, rests my collection of the title On Writing and other memoirs focused on the craft. Several authors have attempted to make sense of their adopted art, and even more have tried to guide others through their creative processes: Virginia Woolf, Ernest Hemingway, Stephen King, Sol Stein, Ray Bradbury, and George Orwell, to name a few. While many of the memoirs composed by those who have found great success in their writing highlight similar themes when discussing the elements of their work, each writer also offers a sort of defense for his or her own approach in connecting a pen to paper. That, of course, is the beauty of writing: an author has freedom within some set conventions, and even these boundaries can be broken if the right time presents itself. After four years of undergraduate study, I think the biggest takeaway from my experience as a pre-service teacher is that education ...

Place-Based Learning: Museums and the Importance of Physical Space in Middle School Education

Before there were formalized schools, there were living rooms, church halls, back steps, battlefields, and the great outdoors. Education came in all shapes and sizes, from the modern understanding of “traditional” study through the analysis of past writings and artifacts to the natural signals one learned to recognize on the farm before an approaching storm. Students were not just young people hunched over a book shielded from the world behind brick walls. They were citizens learning how to manage a family business, reading and printing newspapers, planting seeds, plowing land, and striving to better prepare themselves for the future, whatever it held for them. Today’s students aim to do the same. Yet their education seems to have restricted itself to the boundaries of school property, or perhaps it occasionally wanders beyond county lines. What happened to learning about your environment— and all the life that lived and lives within it— by experiencing everything it has to offer fir...