Skip to main content

The Royal "We" - ST Week 6.1

Today, students on Team Nova finished watching James Cameron’s Avatar, our main vehicle for discussing the Native American experience of Westward Expansion in the United States. Returning from the weekend break after three days of substitute teachers last Wednesday through Friday, students understandably struggled with the transition back to their normal classroom routines. All the same, today’s humanities class activities fit into a similar lesson plan to the one used this past Friday, which I believe helped students adjust to Nova’s face changes more smoothly.

After wrapping up our Avatar viewing, Mr. J and I led a review discussion on how the film compares to the many Native American encounters with white settlers circa 1800-1890. Before diving into the discussion with each class, however, Mr. J stressed one point that carried over from the discussions I led last week: we as individuals cannot and do not speak for a whole group of people or for a single set of beliefs. 


Source: http://www.copywritingisart.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/royal-we-1024x420.png


Now, last week I emphasized this point with my students when I caught myself saying “we” almost every time I referred to the white settlers pushing west. As I became more aware of my using the Royal “We” as a blanket term for white settlers/ European Americans, I paused the discussion to explain that by “we,” I did not mean my students and me today. Rather, I justified using “we” as a way to represent ourselves as modern American settlers, advanced in medicine and technology that impacts our lives today, just as the white settlers pushing west created beneficial and devastating ripples for indigenous America. I did my best to make sure that students understood I did not mean “we” as in WE should carry the blame of those who settled here before us. No individual should carry the weight some part of their identity may have dragged through the past. It is not our responsibility to alter history or feel shame for things that we did not personally do. Instead, it is our responsibility as humans to recognize the rights and wrongs of the past, and then repair any damage that the repercussions of past wrongs have sustained in our modern society. “We” may not have actively forced Native Americans off of their tribal lands, but “we” can certainly recognize the harm in doing so and prevent similar (if only subtle) events from reviving the corrupt values of history’s dominant groups. Today, Mr. J again delivered this message to our students when employing “we” to refer to white settlers.

Although I cannot be sure if every student understood our message about the Royal “We” (and if they did, just how much of the message was received or agreed with), I believe addressing the idea of using “we” as a collective for past Americans is essential to maintaining a safe learning environment keen for hard historical discussions in any classroom. When asked if they had any thoughts or concerns about our explanations for using “we” to refer to past Americans, no student objected to the language choice so many historians tend to make when writing from a perspective that can identify with their focus in some way. I am not sure how comfortable I would be with objecting to my teacher’s use of “we” if I were an eighth grade student, and the inability to gauge the situation accurately based on the likely chance that one student was uncomfortable enough to suffer in silence is more than convincing that I should continue the conversation with a conscious switch from “we” to “white settlers.” The expression of popular ideas, especially those that are repeatedly examined through a Royal “We” rhetoric that rallies support for a particular (usually patriotic) theme or message, can be challenging when the popular language employed toes the line between self-identification and objective offense. In the future, I plan to pay closer attention to the language I use when describing historical ideas that could easily encompass a Royal “We.” For now, I know I will make the conscious effort to continue helping my students identify with historical narratives without using “we” to refer to a collective group solely because the group members were advanced Americans.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Multimedia and Westward Expansion - ST Week 2.3

Happy Thursday! As the first week of my student teaching semester comes to a close, I thought I would take some time to reflect on the introductory lessons to our Westward Expansion unit. Although most of today’s class time was absorbed by Vermont’s STAR reading exam (I will post my thoughts on the STAR as I learn more about it in the coming days), students had an opportunity to continue their westward expansion work during whatever class time remained after they turned in their exams. By tomorrow (Friday, 1/10), students are expected to have completed the work for the three introductory lessons reviewed earlier this week. From my observations, most students appear to be on track for tomorrow’s due date, but only time will tell! For now, I’d like to focus on the multiple forms of media employed in these opening lessons, and I will note some major points of consideration that I am still pondering after four days of learning. The introductory lessons for the Westward Expansion unit a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Five Cs of Learning That Inspires

Throughout my undergraduate career, almost all of the courses in my education major started the semester with some type of reflection on philosophies in education. Since my courses on child and adolescent development (running in my second and fourth semesters respectively), I have identified most strongly with John Dewey’s Theory of Progressive Education. Progressivism has therefore been a common theme in my blog posts, and today’s reflection will continue my growth and strengthen the philosophical foundation I have built for myself as a progressivist teacher. Of course, other theories in education are worth consideration: behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism, and humanism all offer insight on how we learn from various perspectives of study. However, I find that progressivism (if adopted fully) takes the best points of these theories and blends them together, creating a student-centered learning environment where student needs and interests are at the forefront of their educationa...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Teaching and Reflection

Somewhere on my bookshelves, sandwiched between worn copies of literary classics and young adult novels, rests my collection of the title On Writing and other memoirs focused on the craft. Several authors have attempted to make sense of their adopted art, and even more have tried to guide others through their creative processes: Virginia Woolf, Ernest Hemingway, Stephen King, Sol Stein, Ray Bradbury, and George Orwell, to name a few. While many of the memoirs composed by those who have found great success in their writing highlight similar themes when discussing the elements of their work, each writer also offers a sort of defense for his or her own approach in connecting a pen to paper. That, of course, is the beauty of writing: an author has freedom within some set conventions, and even these boundaries can be broken if the right time presents itself. After four years of undergraduate study, I think the biggest takeaway from my experience as a pre-service teacher is that education ...
Post a Comment
Read more