Skip to main content

The Royal "We" - ST Week 6.1

Today, students on Team Nova finished watching James Cameron’s Avatar, our main vehicle for discussing the Native American experience of Westward Expansion in the United States. Returning from the weekend break after three days of substitute teachers last Wednesday through Friday, students understandably struggled with the transition back to their normal classroom routines. All the same, today’s humanities class activities fit into a similar lesson plan to the one used this past Friday, which I believe helped students adjust to Nova’s face changes more smoothly.

After wrapping up our Avatar viewing, Mr. J and I led a review discussion on how the film compares to the many Native American encounters with white settlers circa 1800-1890. Before diving into the discussion with each class, however, Mr. J stressed one point that carried over from the discussions I led last week: we as individuals cannot and do not speak for a whole group of people or for a single set of beliefs. 


Source: http://www.copywritingisart.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/royal-we-1024x420.png


Now, last week I emphasized this point with my students when I caught myself saying “we” almost every time I referred to the white settlers pushing west. As I became more aware of my using the Royal “We” as a blanket term for white settlers/ European Americans, I paused the discussion to explain that by “we,” I did not mean my students and me today. Rather, I justified using “we” as a way to represent ourselves as modern American settlers, advanced in medicine and technology that impacts our lives today, just as the white settlers pushing west created beneficial and devastating ripples for indigenous America. I did my best to make sure that students understood I did not mean “we” as in WE should carry the blame of those who settled here before us. No individual should carry the weight some part of their identity may have dragged through the past. It is not our responsibility to alter history or feel shame for things that we did not personally do. Instead, it is our responsibility as humans to recognize the rights and wrongs of the past, and then repair any damage that the repercussions of past wrongs have sustained in our modern society. “We” may not have actively forced Native Americans off of their tribal lands, but “we” can certainly recognize the harm in doing so and prevent similar (if only subtle) events from reviving the corrupt values of history’s dominant groups. Today, Mr. J again delivered this message to our students when employing “we” to refer to white settlers.

Although I cannot be sure if every student understood our message about the Royal “We” (and if they did, just how much of the message was received or agreed with), I believe addressing the idea of using “we” as a collective for past Americans is essential to maintaining a safe learning environment keen for hard historical discussions in any classroom. When asked if they had any thoughts or concerns about our explanations for using “we” to refer to past Americans, no student objected to the language choice so many historians tend to make when writing from a perspective that can identify with their focus in some way. I am not sure how comfortable I would be with objecting to my teacher’s use of “we” if I were an eighth grade student, and the inability to gauge the situation accurately based on the likely chance that one student was uncomfortable enough to suffer in silence is more than convincing that I should continue the conversation with a conscious switch from “we” to “white settlers.” The expression of popular ideas, especially those that are repeatedly examined through a Royal “We” rhetoric that rallies support for a particular (usually patriotic) theme or message, can be challenging when the popular language employed toes the line between self-identification and objective offense. In the future, I plan to pay closer attention to the language I use when describing historical ideas that could easily encompass a Royal “We.” For now, I know I will make the conscious effort to continue helping my students identify with historical narratives without using “we” to refer to a collective group solely because the group members were advanced Americans.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Multimedia and Westward Expansion - ST Week 2.3

Happy Thursday! As the first week of my student teaching semester comes to a close, I thought I would take some time to reflect on the introductory lessons to our Westward Expansion unit. Although most of today’s class time was absorbed by Vermont’s STAR reading exam (I will post my thoughts on the STAR as I learn more about it in the coming days), students had an opportunity to continue their westward expansion work during whatever class time remained after they turned in their exams. By tomorrow (Friday, 1/10), students are expected to have completed the work for the three introductory lessons reviewed earlier this week. From my observations, most students appear to be on track for tomorrow’s due date, but only time will tell! For now, I’d like to focus on the multiple forms of media employed in these opening lessons, and I will note some major points of consideration that I am still pondering after four days of learning. The introductory lessons for the Westward Expansion unit a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Senior Year! Starting off with Inclusion and Big IDEAs

Hello! It has been a long summer and a rapid start to my last year as an undergraduate at Saint Michael’s College, but I am excited to be back in the classroom (both at St. Mike’s for my senior Education and American Studies courses, and Essex Middle School for my final placement and student teaching)! Before the student teaching semester begins, most secondary education students at St. Mike’s wrap up their studies with two courses focused on classroom particulars: teaching in an inclusive classroom, and approaches to teaching in your specific content area (which, for me, is humanities). As the title of this blog post suggests, I would like to reflect on some recent conversations and learning from my Teaching in an Inclusive Middle/High School Classroom course, namely those regarding the history and development of inclusive law. The idea that all students, no matter their race, ethnicity, religion, intellectual or physical ability, etc. should have access to free, public, app...
Post a Comment
Read more

Theories in Education: Dewey, Parker, and Progressivism

Looking around a college classroom, it is less likely that a student will ask the professor a question than it would be if the students were all in kindergarten. Somewhere along our careers in education, the wonder dies. Not completely, but almost completely. Students stop asking questions, but continually feel pressure to produce correct answers. Where is the education system going wrong? The American education system has abandoned a wide variety of academic subjects for a more STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) based curriculum several times in the young country's history. The Industrial Revolution, the Machine Age, and the Space Race all shifted the focus of American schools to mechanics, math, and other STEM subjects. While there is less pressure to teach strictly STEM, the effects of the educational shifts are long-lasting. Even today, it seems that humanities classes are more focused on grammar and syntax than creativity and imagination. However, th...
1 comment
Read more