Skip to main content

Assessing Traditional Tests - ST Week 8.2

Happy Wednesday! As Team Nova wades knee-deep in our new “We The People” first amendment debate unit, students are still thinking about westward expansion in the United States, likely because the closure that a graded summative assessment brings to a unit did not arrive until today. After nearly six weeks of readings, discussions, and a screening of James Cameron’s Avatar, Team Nova spent last Thursday taking their first (and probably only) major test of the year. Now, here’s a disclaimer: Mr. J. is not a fan of assessing student learning by an individual’s performance on traditionally styled tests (like those including multiple-choice questions, short essay responses, matching sections, true or false, etc.). I myself prefer to assess student progress and learning via writing prompts, performance assessments, personal communications, and any other forms of assessment that do not require highly accurate recall on top of reading, writing, and comprehension skills. However, with EMS eighth graders moving on to Essex High School in a few short months, Mr. J. deemed it essential to our students’ academic and emotional preparation that they experience at least one class-long exam this year.


Unfortunately, final scores did not land as high as we had hoped on our proficiency scale, with Nova’s average proficiency score hovering around a 2.9 out of 4. While students are expected to perform at proficiency (meeting the standards for an overall score of 3 out of 4) on all assignments, a student’s final class grade is determined by the average of his or her assignment proficiency scores. 2.9 is by no means a bad class proficiency average, but there are a few test taking factors that have Mr. J., my students, and I wondering just what prevented further test success for Team Nova: students were allowed to have printed notes as long as they followed a given format and contained information on westward expansion written in their own words, and our humanities classes spent three whole days before the test invested in topic review. Were student notes disorganized, overfilled, inefficient, or lacking key information? Did the review days not cater to student needs, or did we as teachers misunderstand where misconceptions existed? Did students not ask the right questions, or were they unaware of what they didn’t know? Was our formative data (which, for the most part, showed that students understood our classroom discussions and most key vocabulary terms) inaccurate or flawed? Did the low scores from the previous mapping quizzes discourage students when mapping again appeared on the test? There are so many questions I have about our westward expansion test, and from my experiences in the classroom thus far, I am positive that most students could point to the answer of more than one of these questions as their main obstacle on exam day. Furthermore, I am confident in my belief that each student would name a different obstacle from any one of the students sitting next to them. So, how does an educator process test data like this in a way that will benefit his or her teaching, but also the students who are coping with the aftermath of low test scores now?

After some careful consideration, Mr. J. decided to scale the test by 8 points, raising our highest score from a 92 to a 100, and subsequently raising other students almost 10 points higher than their original score. Students will not have the option to retake the exam, but options for extra credit are available for the students who are concerned about their overall humanities grade. While I cannot say for certain what I would do in response to a respectable but still low team average on an exam I gave, I do know that I would reflect on the test scores as an indicator that something in my lesson implementation was weaker than what it could have been. For now, Mr. J. and I can at least rest assured that our students have been exposed to traditional test taking, and that we are all learning from the westward expansion test results as a classroom community.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Multimedia and Westward Expansion - ST Week 2.3

Happy Thursday! As the first week of my student teaching semester comes to a close, I thought I would take some time to reflect on the introductory lessons to our Westward Expansion unit. Although most of today’s class time was absorbed by Vermont’s STAR reading exam (I will post my thoughts on the STAR as I learn more about it in the coming days), students had an opportunity to continue their westward expansion work during whatever class time remained after they turned in their exams. By tomorrow (Friday, 1/10), students are expected to have completed the work for the three introductory lessons reviewed earlier this week. From my observations, most students appear to be on track for tomorrow’s due date, but only time will tell! For now, I’d like to focus on the multiple forms of media employed in these opening lessons, and I will note some major points of consideration that I am still pondering after four days of learning. The introductory lessons for the Westward Expansion unit a...

Senior Year! Starting off with Inclusion and Big IDEAs

Hello! It has been a long summer and a rapid start to my last year as an undergraduate at Saint Michael’s College, but I am excited to be back in the classroom (both at St. Mike’s for my senior Education and American Studies courses, and Essex Middle School for my final placement and student teaching)! Before the student teaching semester begins, most secondary education students at St. Mike’s wrap up their studies with two courses focused on classroom particulars: teaching in an inclusive classroom, and approaches to teaching in your specific content area (which, for me, is humanities). As the title of this blog post suggests, I would like to reflect on some recent conversations and learning from my Teaching in an Inclusive Middle/High School Classroom course, namely those regarding the history and development of inclusive law. The idea that all students, no matter their race, ethnicity, religion, intellectual or physical ability, etc. should have access to free, public, app...

Theories in Education: Dewey, Parker, and Progressivism

Looking around a college classroom, it is less likely that a student will ask the professor a question than it would be if the students were all in kindergarten. Somewhere along our careers in education, the wonder dies. Not completely, but almost completely. Students stop asking questions, but continually feel pressure to produce correct answers. Where is the education system going wrong? The American education system has abandoned a wide variety of academic subjects for a more STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) based curriculum several times in the young country's history. The Industrial Revolution, the Machine Age, and the Space Race all shifted the focus of American schools to mechanics, math, and other STEM subjects. While there is less pressure to teach strictly STEM, the effects of the educational shifts are long-lasting. Even today, it seems that humanities classes are more focused on grammar and syntax than creativity and imagination. However, th...