Skip to main content

Troublemakers, by Carla Shalaby

Out of any word in the English language, I think I am most intimidated by “power.” It is full of contradictions: Power provokes a sense of accomplishment while implying the achievement and maintenance of power requires competition, hierarchy, and domination. Power is given and taken easily, and it yields to external factors beyond its control. Some people fear power, others are generous with it, and still more meet their doom when pride becomes its companion. Power allows for advancement. It provides a sense of order and control, but it can also create and fuel chaos. Individuals, groups, small islands, and large nations all possess a certain degree of power. As a future educator, the environment of my classroom will depend entirely on how I and my students handle the power we are given in our teacher-student relationships. More importantly, my power as a potential change-maker in their lives— through traditional lessons, personal relationships, worldly guidance, and honest compassion— will stem from the bonds I form with students as a person connecting with people. For the past few weeks, I have read and discussed Troublemakers: Lessons in Freedom From Young Children At School, by Carla Shalaby, with my peers in our Middle Grades Organization class here at St. Mike’s. Tracing the ups and downs, goods and not-so-goods of four elementary schoolers deemed “troublemakers” by their learning communities, Shalaby’s text asks the reader to consider best teaching practices and what schools can do better as places of learning and whole-student support. Through Shalaby’s case studies, I discovered a lot about the role power plays in the classroom. These students attend schools that seem to embrace both progressive and traditional teaching practices, yet their teachers’ ability to consistently reach them as people rather than “troublemakers” depends on their available resources, their success in developing promising plans for classroom management, and how they choose to implement their power.
Source: https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51vSOF6XkHL._SY346_.jpg
When thinking about my own future classroom, it is much easier for me to identify how and when I do not want to exercise my power as a teacher than to ponder how and when I do. That’s the tricky thing about authority: how I choose to embrace my power as an educator when it comes to my students will depend entirely on the relationships I forge with each one individually. Different students have different needs and respond to different teaching methods. With this understanding, the only way I know I would want to use my power as a teacher is by shaping my lessons and relationships with students so that they meet my students’ needs. However, I can think of plenty of ways I would not want to exercise my power, all of which are best summarized by four larger ideas:
  1. I do not want to be the loudest, most correct, or only voice in the room. All voices in the classroom matter if the environment is truly conducive to learning and compassion.
  2. I do not want to be the only teacher in the room. I want to learn from my students just as much as they learn from me, if not more.
  3. I do not want to make every learning decision for my students. I want students, families, classroom support staff, and the wider community to contribute to the learning process.
  4. I do not want to see students only as students subordinate to my role as a teacher. I want to educate young people and prepare them for their futures as global citizens.

Of course, there are numerous examples of situations in which my position as an authority figure will require hard decisions and a firmer grip on the classroom reins. But these circumstances will change with every new group of students and every passing day, so I can only commit to how I know I will not exercise my power as a teacher. I suppose of even greater importance than the four points above is this: Power will not be an intimidating word in my classroom. Instead, it will be the balance of love and learning that has an equal impact on both teacher and student.

Comments

  1. Hi Allie! I really appreciated your examination of the word power--it has such a heavy undertone that is initially intimidating, but so important to explore within the context of school. I loved how you broke your ideas down into four broad categories that allow you to be flexible to the needs of your students. I think one of the exciting (albeit challenging) parts of teaching is that we, like our students, are never static and continually define and redefine what our roles are on a daily basis.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Allie! I also like how you analyzed the word power; and it is such a major theme of Troublemakers. It's refreshing to see the four things you don't want to do within your future classroom because it's oriented for the student and gives students agency and voice. Power can be a tricky and dangerous thing, but if it's fair and equitable it can cultivate the confidence needed to empower and motivate students.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Power is a very domineering word and I appreciate that you acknowledge that and its other aspects. I think it is so important for the mindset surrounding power in the classroom to change, and that the power in a relationship, especially with teachers and students, is entirely dependent on that specific relationship. You raise a lot of good points in this post and definitely make me reconsider my view of this book! Well done!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you Allie for your insightful post! The word power can quickly move us into thinking about compliance and an authoritarian approach. Yet, as you listed in your commitments, power, in schools, is about supporting young people in finding their own personal power and purpose. - Lindsey

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Multimedia and Westward Expansion - ST Week 2.3

Happy Thursday! As the first week of my student teaching semester comes to a close, I thought I would take some time to reflect on the introductory lessons to our Westward Expansion unit. Although most of today’s class time was absorbed by Vermont’s STAR reading exam (I will post my thoughts on the STAR as I learn more about it in the coming days), students had an opportunity to continue their westward expansion work during whatever class time remained after they turned in their exams. By tomorrow (Friday, 1/10), students are expected to have completed the work for the three introductory lessons reviewed earlier this week. From my observations, most students appear to be on track for tomorrow’s due date, but only time will tell! For now, I’d like to focus on the multiple forms of media employed in these opening lessons, and I will note some major points of consideration that I am still pondering after four days of learning. The introductory lessons for the Westward Expansion unit a...

Senior Year! Starting off with Inclusion and Big IDEAs

Hello! It has been a long summer and a rapid start to my last year as an undergraduate at Saint Michael’s College, but I am excited to be back in the classroom (both at St. Mike’s for my senior Education and American Studies courses, and Essex Middle School for my final placement and student teaching)! Before the student teaching semester begins, most secondary education students at St. Mike’s wrap up their studies with two courses focused on classroom particulars: teaching in an inclusive classroom, and approaches to teaching in your specific content area (which, for me, is humanities). As the title of this blog post suggests, I would like to reflect on some recent conversations and learning from my Teaching in an Inclusive Middle/High School Classroom course, namely those regarding the history and development of inclusive law. The idea that all students, no matter their race, ethnicity, religion, intellectual or physical ability, etc. should have access to free, public, app...

Theories in Education: Dewey, Parker, and Progressivism

Looking around a college classroom, it is less likely that a student will ask the professor a question than it would be if the students were all in kindergarten. Somewhere along our careers in education, the wonder dies. Not completely, but almost completely. Students stop asking questions, but continually feel pressure to produce correct answers. Where is the education system going wrong? The American education system has abandoned a wide variety of academic subjects for a more STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) based curriculum several times in the young country's history. The Industrial Revolution, the Machine Age, and the Space Race all shifted the focus of American schools to mechanics, math, and other STEM subjects. While there is less pressure to teach strictly STEM, the effects of the educational shifts are long-lasting. Even today, it seems that humanities classes are more focused on grammar and syntax than creativity and imagination. However, th...